|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Caleb Ayrania
Gallente
TarNec
   |
Posted - 2011.06.08 08:58:00 -
[1]
ccp wont even give us shares trading, or the needed tweaks to make shares and the trading of them effecient and viable..
All these awesome ideas are wasted here..
For thing like this to be even remotely possible a larger and more concise description and line of suggestions of features and changes would be needed.
Points for aiming at the stars though, sometimes you hit the moon when doing so..
Tycoon wannabe go here: SCC Lounge
cocktails and Dreams. |
Caleb Ayrania
Gallente
TarNec
|
Posted - 2011.06.08 14:55:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Strrog
This type of economic mechanism is really overdue in eve. My main problem as a potential industrialist would be getting money for the start up operations. Currently you pretty much have to have 2 accounts one for grinding missions to get the start up capital and the other account with all the skills needed to research/build/trade. All this does not really fall into concept of the game in terms of be what you like to be... without the initial start up.
The attached loaned money to the account sounds like a great idea and imo should greatly reduce risk of scamming. Plus it adds real world experience as you just cant runaway with somebodies money ( Usually ).. Concord enforced credit market looks pretty solid.
And for veterans with sizeable wallets will create great opportunities for wealth management/protection.
I still do not get it why there is no similar tools available to players after so many years of EVE as a simulator.
There is a little issue in that argument. The reason you need a second account is because you might be to focused on PVE and Solo gameplay. If ccp is limiting the benefits from that I see that as a BIG win for the game.
The question should be focused on how to create better tools for more viable pvp fininacially and otherwise. The new API will help alot. If we could get a contract system to sell shares would help, or an actual market section that works. Best bet atm is player created workarounds.
What we need from ccp is not more protection or new "easy and safe" systems. We need better degrees of freedom and features that have potential good usage and bad ones. The balance and the choice of how to use a feature is what creates the game.. There is already more then enough safety build in from to many people falling for scams and criminals. These things arent helping the game, a way to reciprocate would.
We need a better aggression system, and we need some way of restricing who has access to markets. A higher impact of faction and npc corp standing to trade would be a potential solution. A way to make player versus player aggression more "chaotic" like if a +5 vs -5 gave you kill rights in the faction held space. Or something along these line...
Tycoon wannabe go here: SCC Lounge
cocktails and Dreams. |
Caleb Ayrania
Gallente
TarNec
|
Posted - 2011.06.09 11:22:00 -
[3]
Hexxx just made me feel a bit dirty.. I had to agree on all the arguments of how a corporation has more credit value, than an individual, and thus a better persistent reputation.
They dont however have a personality or a soul, unless they are fundamentally a Leviathan of the ruler. In which case they tend to go into megalomania. 
Also in this whole thing on creditors the issue of trust and face is rather relevant.
Tycoon wannabe go here: SCC Lounge
cocktails and Dreams. |
|
|
| |
|